Medical Marijuana Issue in Florida: One Big Pot Hole

On August 29, 2013, the Federal Department of Justice granted a memorandum stating it is going to continue to count on local authorities and state to address marijuana activity through enforcement of state narcotics laws. Nevertheless, in light of new state laws allowing for possession of a small quantities of marijuana and regulating production, sale and processing of marijuana, the Department designated eight criteria to guide state law enforcement. States must (1) prevent the distribution of marijuana to minors; (2) prevent revenue from the sale of marijuana from moving to criminal enterprises; (three) avoid the diversion of marijuana coming from states in which it's authorized to states where it is illegal; (4) prevent marijuana pastime from being used as a cover for the trafficking of other illegal drugs; (five) prevent violence and the use of firearms in the taking care as well as distribution of marijuana; (6) prevent drugged driving as well as the exacerbation of other adverse public health effects associated with marijuana consumption; (seven) stop the growth of marijuana on public lands; and (8) prevent marijuana possession or use on federal property. In the function that the Federal Government establishes that States are not adhering to such criteria, the Federal Government reserves its right to challenge State laws. The Feds did not say how any of that was to be completed. They just said the states should do that in this article. But Florida has evidently been looking the other way.

The new Law

In passing CS/CS/SB 1030, Florida has missed several key issues. Consider, for instance, the brand new law, which has the following features:

It makes "low THC cannabis" legal when prescribed by a medical doctor or osteopathic physician for a patient who has certain medical conditions. Which problems? Cancer, seizures, severe or persistent muscle spasms. Seems clear enough. Here's the place that the Florida Legislature made the decision to go off track-

An individual is considered qualified to get this treatment if (among other things), the person is a permanent resident of Florida as well as the physician determines that the chances of ordering the pot are reasonable. How does a physician determine whether the patient is a permanent resident? Do you have any protection for making that decision in great faith? Nope. How does a physician help make the reasonableness determination? Is the study of marijuana use also part of the medical college curriculum? No.

Amazingly, the Florida Medical Association and the Florida Osteopathic Medical Association have accountability, starting October, 1, 2014, to educate prescribing physicians via an eight hour training program. How the Legislature made the decision to set aside that function on the FMA and FOMA, why they also want that task (beyond collecting non dues revenues) and just how the drafters came up with eight hours (does that consist of water and bathroom breaks?) is a question. And exactly how this sort of training pertains at all to the daily medical practice of the physicians taking these types of a program is additionally absent. Can an orthopedist do it? Sure. How about a pathologist? You guess. A physician? No problem. Why would a profitable, practicing physician elect to pursue this brand new direction? How's the "highest and best use" for an excellently skilled cardiologist, family practitioner or even anesthesiologist? Assessing an individual with cancer or who has awful seizures who would probably gain from medical marijuana calls for no more than an eight hour program? I believed it required training in internal medicine, neurology and... cancer. And so, is this a medically, clinically driven law designed to aid folks in need or one that just makes everyone which is sure gets the piece of theirs of the pie? It seems to avoid the mark.

Florida has reportedly had a lengthy and lingering problem with the matter of drug diversion. Folks from all over have gotten to Florida not just condor cbd gummies for ed ( hop over to this web-site - https://www.kentreporter.com/blog/condor-cbd-gummies-review-worth-the-mo... ) the sunshine, but also for all the oxies, roxies and numerous other controlled substances. Has that problem been licked? Was law enforcement consulted on the public safety failures working in the law? Were they in the drafting space when the bill was produced? I do not know, but it is difficult to see any of the fingerprints of theirs on the brand new law. It seems we've just dumped this matter on them! Anywhere, for instance, is the roadside test to evaluate people operating motor vehicles under the influence of pot, medical marijuana or otherwise? It does not occur! There's no chance to protect the public out of this just yet. The very best they are capable of doing is to send it all to some confirmation laboratory and hold on a day or even so (at a big expense the taxpayers will bear). It's a law without purposeful consequences, and all physician education costs and licensure fees will do is place cash in the spaces of the government and businesses waiting to pounce on the chance.

One brilliant spot... the Legislature has made a decision to study the usage of medical marijuana. Yep. They have put aside one BILLION... I mean thousand dollars (about the price of an internet site) for the Department of Health Biomedical Research Program to master cannabidol and its effect on intractable childhood epilepsy, an extremely laudable seeming idea. And so the places where will the remainder of the cash come from to do exactly what the law mandates the Department of Health is to create a Compassionate Use Registry which (among some other things) prevents a patient seeking prescribed container out of several doctors; establishes dispensing groups throughout Florida; polices the skilled doctors, the dispensing organizations & individuals who may be abusing the law? Just who knows. Question: why don't you examine this BEFORE green lighting the whole concept? Washington and Colorado - https://www.reddit.com/r/howto/search?q=Colorado have both led the way on the problem, so why don't you study the public health as well as medical problems before passing a law with so many open concerns?